With nothing outrageous happening, just the nervous expression on the man’s face, the confidence on the woman’s this easily has as much power as Stanton’s more explicit art.
A one page website for Stan Papell says the writer’s achievements included:
After publishing over twenty short stories in national men’s magazines, he held down a job as jr. copywriter in an ad agency, freelanced work writing booklets, wrote publicity for a Broadway musical, wrote lip-sync dialogue for children’s TV shows such as Ultraman …
Poor guy, assignments like the last one are pretty near the bottom. Thankless work for very low pay. But that would’ve been true of the story illustrated by Stanton, unless by some miracle he was writing about somethine he enjoyed. Usually the lowest tier hack writers weren’t that lucky.
Do you like or dislike the Eric Stanton drawing?
Similar Femdom Art:
I love it. You can see her sexy hips through the thin material… a woman doesn’t have to always wear leather and heels to be dominant. Most women dress far more simply than that.
I really like this type of art. It’s a bit more subtle than much of the femdom material out there, and as such it allows your imagination to work for you.
I won’t go into explicit detail, but with my graphic imagination running rampant I bloody well wish I was in that bloke’s shoes…
The open-endedness, the various stories you can build up from the drawing is what I like about it. That and the expression on the man’s face.
Thanks for the comment.
I can never make up my mind with Stanton. His drawings are graphic, but not sensuous like Van Gotha.
This drawing, however, is intriguing. For example, the guy has a very flat crotch profile. Perhaps he’s wearing a chastity device…
De gustibus non est disputandum
VG is very pretty and technically accomplished. For me Stanton’s people have more convincing posture and facial expression. The latter is more effective for me.
Crotch bulge: the first woman to tie me up and whip me thought I wasn’t excited because I didn’t have an erection. Oddly enough the only part of BDSM that causes one is genital torture. So it isn’t something that would even register in a drawing.
Some of us get hard due to the excitement of the action!
Like many Stanton drawings, it evokes a situation ripe with potential… usually unrealized in the story that follows!
In fact this is one of my Stanton favs. It’s all in the expectation, it gets one’s imagination running. No need to be more explicit…
By the way, I was one of Stanton’s customers. I have material which you might not have, but I do not know where to send it. Please advise.
Another ripe-with-potential Stanton pic here:
http://www.petticoatpunishmentart.com/aa04images/art057.jpg
Dear Crayle
This pic of yours shows Stanton at his best: understatement, leaving room wide open for one’s imagination. Far more interesting than those “Princks” series which he produced later. Most of them were utterly boring