<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salt on His Wounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.femdomartists.com/eric-stanton/salt-on-his-wounds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.femdomartists.com/eric-stanton/salt-on-his-wounds</link>
	<description>Illustrations of male submission, masochism &#38; female dominance, sadism: paintings, drawings, sketches.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:41:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bibliophile</title>
		<link>http://www.femdomartists.com/eric-stanton/salt-on-his-wounds#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Bibliophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femdomartists.com/?p=362#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t suggesting that Ditko was involved in this piece. My point about the numbering is that &quot;Revenge Of The Scorned&quot; was listed after the 13 items that mirror Ditko&#039;s style but well before the final, presumably more recent offerings. This perhaps indicates a late &#039;60s or early &#039;70s date - but in any case no later than 1980, scarcely beyond the halfway mark of Stanton&#039;s career.

&quot;Scorned&quot; has none of Ditko&#039;s trademarks and looks to my eye more like unadulterated Stanton. The reference to &quot;photo retouching&quot; implies that Stanton was tracing over photographs in at least some of the panels.

In fact Ditko has flatly (if implausibly) denied contributing to ANY of Stanton&#039;s erotic output, hence my qualification &quot;apparently inked by Steve Ditko&quot; (lest he sue). That said, in 1985 I wrote a letter to Stanton requesting information about his archive catalogue, in which I naively fawned about being an admirer of his work both as Eric Stanton and as Steve Ditko. In reply I received a pre-printed flyer with a handwritten note scrawled across the bottom:

&quot;Steve Ditko would sometimes ink Eric&#039;s pencil drawings in the 1940&#039;s [sic]. Both men have gone on to do there [sic] own work. Steve &amp; Eric are good friends &amp; amused at the thought that Eric Stanton was a nom-de-plume for Steve.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t suggesting that Ditko was involved in this piece. My point about the numbering is that &#8220;Revenge Of The Scorned&#8221; was listed after the 13 items that mirror Ditko&#8217;s style but well before the final, presumably more recent offerings. This perhaps indicates a late &#8217;60s or early &#8217;70s date &#8211; but in any case no later than 1980, scarcely beyond the halfway mark of Stanton&#8217;s career.</p>
<p>&#8220;Scorned&#8221; has none of Ditko&#8217;s trademarks and looks to my eye more like unadulterated Stanton. The reference to &#8220;photo retouching&#8221; implies that Stanton was tracing over photographs in at least some of the panels.</p>
<p>In fact Ditko has flatly (if implausibly) denied contributing to ANY of Stanton&#8217;s erotic output, hence my qualification &#8220;apparently inked by Steve Ditko&#8221; (lest he sue). That said, in 1985 I wrote a letter to Stanton requesting information about his archive catalogue, in which I naively fawned about being an admirer of his work both as Eric Stanton and as Steve Ditko. In reply I received a pre-printed flyer with a handwritten note scrawled across the bottom:</p>
<p>&#8220;Steve Ditko would sometimes ink Eric&#8217;s pencil drawings in the 1940&#8242;s [sic]. Both men have gone on to do there [sic] own work. Steve &amp; Eric are good friends &amp; amused at the thought that Eric Stanton was a nom-de-plume for Steve.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard in Durham, NC</title>
		<link>http://www.femdomartists.com/eric-stanton/salt-on-his-wounds#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard in Durham, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femdomartists.com/?p=362#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Ditko was probably at the height of his powers. That explains the finish. I&#039;d wondered about that.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditko was probably at the height of his powers. That explains the finish. I&#8217;d wondered about that.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bibliophile</title>
		<link>http://www.femdomartists.com/eric-stanton/salt-on-his-wounds#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Bibliophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femdomartists.com/?p=362#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>Neither late nor a swan song! Long before he died in 1999 this was advertised in the 1980 Stanton Archives Catalogue as &quot;Revenge Of The Scorned&quot; (the title assigned to the 1998 Taschen reprint is actually &quot;A Woman&#039;s Scorned&quot;). It was no. 64 in a list of 319 items that seems to be in approximate chronological order of production as nos. 1-13 are all works apparently inked by Steve Ditko, which dates them to the early 1960s when the two men shared a studio.

The full listing reads: &quot;64 REVENGE OF THE SCORNED $20  Artwork and photo retouching by Stanton  A young man is dominated by a big girl out to hurt him. Straddles, smothering moves, and whippings; a stripping and binding with a final servicing of the dominant sexy female in the way she likes it done. Large format 11 x 14 inch pages. A sensational story.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither late nor a swan song! Long before he died in 1999 this was advertised in the 1980 Stanton Archives Catalogue as &#8220;Revenge Of The Scorned&#8221; (the title assigned to the 1998 Taschen reprint is actually &#8220;A Woman&#8217;s Scorned&#8221;). It was no. 64 in a list of 319 items that seems to be in approximate chronological order of production as nos. 1-13 are all works apparently inked by Steve Ditko, which dates them to the early 1960s when the two men shared a studio.</p>
<p>The full listing reads: &#8220;64 REVENGE OF THE SCORNED $20  Artwork and photo retouching by Stanton  A young man is dominated by a big girl out to hurt him. Straddles, smothering moves, and whippings; a stripping and binding with a final servicing of the dominant sexy female in the way she likes it done. Large format 11 x 14 inch pages. A sensational story.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobojack</title>
		<link>http://www.femdomartists.com/eric-stanton/salt-on-his-wounds#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>lobojack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femdomartists.com/?p=362#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>Amazingly good indeed, bearing in mind that this is a late Stanton creations. A sort of swan song !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazingly good indeed, bearing in mind that this is a late Stanton creations. A sort of swan song !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.femdomartists.com @ 2012-02-11 10:40:33 -->
